Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hristo Tsanoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - crz crztalk 05:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hristo Tsanoff

Hristo Tsanoff (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete. I make no comment on whether Mr Tsanoff is notable: he may well be, I hope he is. I merely point out that I cannot verify it: the article cites no references; a google search returns only 228 hits of which his own website is no. 1 and this article is no. 2. The article also gives me no clue why he is considered notable, and neither does it tell me who considers him to be so. RobertG ♬ talk 09:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

• Comment A Google search using the Cyrillic alphabet comes up with 269 hits, many appearing to point to the subject's official web site. --Folantin 09:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete the article does assert notability, and a Google search for "Hristo Tsanoff" would not turn up references that are in Cyrillic. But given his "many international projects" there should be at least some trace of notability in the Latin alphabet. Demiurge 11:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete. Notability is asserted but I also was not able to verify the info here: only 32 unique non-Wikipedia GHits, most linking to his official site. Article has been here for exactly one year and has yet to be properly souced. Should be deleted and resubmitted if and when solid references are found. -- Satori Son 00:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Inadequately referenced, and I couldn't find anything significant when I searched. WMMartin 17:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if expanded and cited source VaclavHav 00:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.