Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HouseCall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Proto::► 11:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HouseCall

HouseCall (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable, online Virus scanner. Prod was contested. savid@n 06:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - not notable per WP:SOFTWARE or WP:WEB. Jayden54 13:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• You seem to have the lingo down, but it is helpful if you actually specify a rationale within those policies (see below). Tarinth 16:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• Merge to Trend Micro, not enough text and notability for the separate article. MaxSem 14:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:SOFTWARE which states that the core products of a notable company may have their own articles. Tarinth 16:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Tarinth. Danny Lilithborne 22:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep as this is more of a promotional product than a "core product". It would be better if some external references were added. Otherwise merge per MaxSem.--Dhartung | Talk 22:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Hmm, what about Housecall ? I'd call that a dicdef much more in need of deletion than this one. Mister.Manticore 00:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep per above. TRKtvtce 01:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.