Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeopath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Homeopathy. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-11 09:27Z

[edit] Homeopath

Homeopath (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Crufty list of initials. Doesn't seem very Wiki to me. Adam Cuerden ^talk 12:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Homeopathy. There doesn't look to me to be any salvagable content here but if so then it can be merged. Otto4711 13:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Otto has it right. Redirect to Homeopathy. What a homeopath is should be able to be gleaned from context accordingly, making this article a bit redundant. --Dennisthe2 21:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• 'Redirect as per comments above. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 17:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per above Alf^Photoman 00:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Question is it my imagination or are we having lots of Homeopathy spam on Afd lately?
• Redirect per above. The one useful thing was the reference on abbreviations, which I've added the main article's EL section. Jim Butler^(talk) 22:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.