Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home (Angel episode)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 02:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Home (Angel episode)

Fancruft. Unencyclopedic, without significance or possibility thereof. Delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 18:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, episode of Angel seen by an audience of millions. Why shouln't people able to look this up? Why destroy? Kappa 18:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • They can look it up in a TV guide, any of the many Buffy fan sites, waiting for a re-run, or getting it on DVD in due time. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 18:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Yeah they can find it somewhere in a copyrighted form, if they are lucky, or if they pay. So much for free acccess to the sum of human knowledge. Kappa 18:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
      • That wasn't the purpose of Wikipedia when I last checked. I respect your vote, but the idea behind it is wrong. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 20:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
        • Did it suddenly change? Jimbo doesn't seem to realize, judging from the message at the top of the page. Kappa 21:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
      • As if insipid garbage like Angel and its like added anything worth recording into the sum total of human knowledge... --Agamemnon2 15:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
        • While I might or might not agree with your point of view, elitism is not a suitable basis for wikipedia policy. Kappa 00:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into List of Angel (series) episodes, or perhaps into lists for each season. These are brief capsules and don't merit 110 separate articles. bikeable (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Kappa. Episode articles do no harm. Xoloz 18:46, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Article needs to be templated with production details, actors, plot points and episode summary. Poorly-constructed but no reason not to keep. -- (aeropagitica)  18:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep along with the other Angel episodes. I'll get to it to wikify and clean it up soon. My current project is cleaning up all the Angel episodes. --Cooksey 19:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Angel was a very popular TV show, and we have episodes of other TV shows. Carioca 19:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Kappa. Free information wasn't the purpose of Wikipedia when you last checked? Okaaaaaaaaay.... CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 23:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as above. Evil Eye 00:19, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per overwhelming precedent and the lack of any policy preventing such articles from being created. (And IMO Pandora's Box is well open so such a policy is unlikely). 23skidoo 17:19, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep' I just edited it to bring it to a higher standard and therefore feel that it's a keeper. Though i'm obviouslt biased. Would be great if anyone wants to build on it further. -- Paxomen 16:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.