Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Shit Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 02:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Holy Shit Wrestling

Good article, but WP:V and WP:NN seem to be fighting in here. This was listed as a red link on the 2 August noms by someone else. It was incomplete. TrackerTV is completing the nomination for 3 August. TrackerTV 01:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. If it weren't for the line "has grown into a cult phenomenon among local college kids and teenagers alike", I'd say it was a CSD A7 (aka {{Db-bio}}). Still, it fails both WP:V and WP:NN, per nom. alphaChimp ^laudare 01:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. SynergeticMaggot 02:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Can't find much of anything on it, seems like a non-notable local phenomenon. InvictaHOG 02:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Holy shit, this is not notable. "Ninja Pete is not in fact a ninja. Instead, he chose the name because he thought it sounded cool" C'mon this is a bunch of kids rolling on the ground with each other in the basement, not WWE.AdamBiswanger1 02:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Shultz IV 02:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and perhaps stick somewhere in the users space, someone went to a lot of trouble to type that all out. Themindset 05:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I'm not sure if this is worth userfying. Non-notable organization unverifiable with reliable sources. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:V and WP:NN. --BrownHairedGirl 07:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:V. Michael 08:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Computerjoe's talk 20:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.