Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic living

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Holism. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-25 05:25Z

[edit] Holistic_living

Holistic_living (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

NN cruft, contains no actual information. 2 of 3 references go to the same NN web source.

Delete Per nomGideonF 01:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete dicdef and neoligism and no assertion that the term is notable.-Markeer 01:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 03:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete nothing for me to add. YechielMan 05:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with holism. ConDem^Talk 05:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge as per ConDem. - WeniWidiWiki 06:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• I'll be so bold as to say Transwiki to Wikt else Merge per above. // 3R1C 15:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Holistic living! It's just so. . . oh, wow, man, have you ever looked at your hand? I mean, really looked? (Redirect to holism, not sure there's much to merge here.) - Smerdis of Tlön 15:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.