Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilal khashan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 16:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hilal khashan

WP:BIO and WP:PROF, nn person, reads like resume, give no notion of notablity; author removed speedy and prod nominations SkierRMH 05:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:PROF, none of his books get close to even 200 hits. Ultra-Loser ^{[ T ] [ C ]} 06:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above, only 911 non-wiki ghits. MER-C 06:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:PROF. Books listed are not notable. Seraphimblade 06:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Change to keep given new information and sources-apparently some note is taken of his work. Seraphimblade 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep A professor of political science at the American University of Beirut is quite notable. He has a significant (though not overwhelming) Google Scholar presence. In other words, he is a Arab voice with a significant foothold in Western academia. I prefer to err on the safe side of WP:BIAS in a case like this one. 08:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC) That was me. Stammer 09:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Although his books are not highly listed, I suggest that a University professor, albeit in the Arab world, with a degree from a university in the USA must be seen as notable.--Anthony.bradbury 23:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. His books are taken seriously, with multiple independent reviews; and his quantative survey work is widely reported - for example, in Israel [1] and by Pew [2]. --Mereda 17:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Authored lead article in inaugural issue of the Middle East Quarterly and served on its board for seven years.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.