Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HiWF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tyrenius 16:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HiWF

None notable e-fed (people who pretend to be wrestlers by writing roleplays), thus none notable. Strong Delete Englishrose 12:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - not notable. MER-C 12:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Not notable to you, but notable to others... Notable to the people who write and those who read it... Obviously Vince McMahon owns a large stake in this website so other wrestling federations are forced to be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.1.135.63 (talk • contribs).

• Comment As far as I know, neither WWE nor any other professional wrestling company holds any stake in the Wikimedia Foundation. If what you say is true, then there would not be any articles on Total Nonstop Action Wrestling. Wikipedia precedent has stated that as a rule, E-Federations are non-notable. In fact, one of the larger interfed websites, RoughKut is currently going through an AfD nomination, which they will probably lose. I know it sounds cliche, but if we allow your E-Fed, we have to allow all the E-Feds out there, even the ones that suck. I feel your pain, I'm an E-Fedder too, but Wikipedia is not the place to advertise for your site. --Roninbk 21:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 'cuz it's a big conspiracy. o_O Danny Lilithborne 23:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Because if the phrase E-Fed, or E-Wrestling is notable, than a large E-Fed should be notable if only to add to the E-Wrestling entry. Enjinc2000 08:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia precedent states that individual E-Feds are not notable. Please visit E-wrestling Wiki at wikia.com. You can list this over there.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.