Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heretical (website)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Heretical (website)

Heretical_(website) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

The article's content is information that is in the Simon Sheppard article. It is meaning less to have two articles with the same info.You very nice place 01:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Categorizing debate: W (Web or internet) Zahakiel 15:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It's OR and POV article. It should be removed unless there is another reliable site which supports its contents.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 17:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, then redirect for the following reasons: (1) the article provides no proof that the website is notable, nor was I able to find (through a brief Google search) multiple independent, reliable sources that cover the website non-trivially; (2) the article reproduces largely reproduces content already contained at Simon Sheppard. I think a redirect from here to Simon Sheppard would be appropriate. However, given that the current content of this article is unsourced and may be controversial, I think it ought to be deleted (i.e., its history removed from public view) before it is redirected. -- Black Falcon 22:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 04:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • MERGE it with the Simon Sheppard (activist) article. That would put both articles in context and perhaps the sum of the two will form a better article.

--Ng.j 04:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge and redirect. It's the obvious solution. The website is not worth an article by itself, but it provides proper context to Sheppard's bio. YechielMan 04:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge - Re-direct not needed. Springnuts 20:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Clarification I typed the wrong edit summary - please ignore the edit summary which should have read "merge". Springnuts 21:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)