Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Bush

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Henry Bush

From "What Wikipedia is not: Wikipedia entries are not: Genealogical entries or phonebook entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety." Mmoneypenny 15:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Besides which, he might not even be GWB's great-etc.-grandfather, as the article on Richard Bush states that the paternity is "conjectural". ... discospinster _talk 15:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and rediect into Bush family. Should be mentioned there, but need not have his own article. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Bush as unverifiable. Would revert back to M&R position if a good source is given, however. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 16:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Russ Blau (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unreferenced, unencyclopaedic. Guy 20:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —dima/s-ko/ 00:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Storkk 07:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I think some of the other Bush ancestor articles may need to be deleted also. (the non-notable ones, of course). Stancel Spencer 09:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain --83.118.141.133 15:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.