Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helltrain
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as copyvio. W.marsh 16:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Helltrain
currently a copyvio, but don't let that fool you into thinking the content was any good. If this band is notable (which it might be, the article does not make much of a case), someone will be along with something better Real Soon Now. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 
22:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain, why list copyvio here? Kappa 09:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- Because that's usually an indicator of an article that's non-notable, as they tend to be pasted wholesale from personal websites, company pages, or whatever. Not that being a copyvio is an automatic nn, just that the majority of articles that have been copyvios have turned out to be regarding nn subjects. In any case, delete.--み使い Mitsukai 16:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- If it's going to be deleted anyway, who cares if it's notable or not? Kappa 16:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- Because that's usually an indicator of an article that's non-notable, as they tend to be pasted wholesale from personal websites, company pages, or whatever. Not that being a copyvio is an automatic nn, just that the majority of articles that have been copyvios have turned out to be regarding nn subjects. In any case, delete.--み使い Mitsukai 16:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- Leave it to WP:CP. Stifle 23:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
