Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hector Acuña
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedied by user request. android79 03:24, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Hector Acuña
Dr. Acuña feels this page is an insult, offensive to his persona.
- Delete seems also like a joke -- (drini's page|☎) 18:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Background: The article appears to have been written by the students of a Peruvian mathematics teacher, who apparently requests that it be deleted. Comment: As the article does not fulfill WP:V and WP:NOR, I'm voting to delete. encephalon 19:17, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Speedy as CSD:A7. IMO a math professorship and owning cows doesn't even attempt to establish notability. Factor in the apparent request by the subject for removal... I'd say this is a good speedy candidate.Otherwise, simply delete.--Isotope23 19:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)- FWIW, 1. the article as it stands makes too many claims that can reasonably be taken as assertions of notability. 2. the thoughts of the subject of an article on the article can be important context, but should not enter into decision making over keeping or deleting the article. Kind regards encephalon 19:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- You're such a stickler enceph :)--Isotope23 20:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Aren't I? :) If it means anything, it's borne out of experience with a functional bureaucracy. When you see very poor articles get speedied, but then nominated for undeletion at VFU and then returned to AFD to get redeleted 20 days later, that sort of becomes a strong incentive to help get things done correctly the first time, if only to save us some time. But you're right, it makes me look like a humorless drone. :) encephalon 20:51, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- You're such a stickler enceph :)--Isotope23 20:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- FWIW, 1. the article as it stands makes too many claims that can reasonably be taken as assertions of notability. 2. the thoughts of the subject of an article on the article can be important context, but should not enter into decision making over keeping or deleting the article. Kind regards encephalon 19:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Has assertions of notability, which prevents it from falling under CSD:A7, as per enceph, but still nn. But how do we verify that the subject is actually the one asking for removal? PacknCanes 22:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
His students, such as me, thought he would appreciate this article on him. However, it seems that he does not. Due to the quotes and due to the fact that he does not like parents of new students to go online look for his name and find out most of his life. He simply feel its an invasion of privacy. If you check the History it was I who started the article, so you can verify so.
We feel we have caused enough trouble. Please delete the page. Please.misantropoalon
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
