Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heart to Heart International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Bobet 13:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Heart to Heart International

nn Organization--Sss6e 08:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as NN by any reasonable definition. --Dennette 10:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Dennette. -Fsotrain₀₉ 19:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep article is being expanded everyday as I have time between college classes. --Computernoob 15:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Do not bite the newcomers, user produced valid response. Probably watch article and verify again if it is noteable. User:Yy-bo 20:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep More information has been given since submission for deletion. --Kinggober 16:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment The above keep opinion comes from a single purpose account. Pascal.Tesson 23:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment I am not a single purpose user. Good guess though. --Kinggober 16:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• Neutral Definitely spammish but on the other hand, Google seems to know about it[1]. Probably does meet WP:ORG. Pascal.Tesson 23:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Petros471 16:00, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, needs work though. Charles Matthews 07:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Looks notable enough. -- Necrothesp 00:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - a worthwhile organisation that is being run efficiently here. Yes the article needs slimming down and cleaning up but I am very happy for Wikipedia to have information on this charity. TerriersFan 02:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable. --Vsion 03:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.