Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaiian Independence Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hawaiian sovereignty movement. I read both and the soverignty movement article seems to already contain everything from this article. If there's anything worth merging, it can be found in the page history. Kimchi.sg 01:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hawaiian Independence Movement

1) Repeated NPOV violations; 2) Material covered elsewhere Jpetersen46321 01:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment: I don't think NPOV violations are criteria for deletion. --HResearcher 06:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• weak Keep biased article. But could be salvaged. --Ageo020 01:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete then redirect to Hawaiian sovereignty movement - we don't need both and I don't see much that's worth merging. It's already covered elsewhere. BigDT 01:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

You mean blank then redirect. Why delete it (admin action) when it's only going to be recreated to enter the redirect? --HResearcher 10:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• merge - let's do a double check of Hawaiian sovereignty movement, and make sure we don't lose anything. We can work on NPOV tone while still keeping the relevant facts available. --JereKrischel 02:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge - seems like a fork (intended or not!) which should simply be merged back into sovereignty. InvictaHOG 03:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Hawaiian sovereignty movement. Although this particular independence movement may be non-hawaiian and from my understanding the Hawaiian sovereignty movement gives Hawaii back to the native Hawaiians. --HResearcher 06:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Viable info that differs from main article. rootology (T) 08:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge (if there's owt worth merging) and redirect Lurker ^talk 10:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as per InvictaHOG. --BrownHairedGirl 10:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. Currently somone has removed all content of the article, but there might be something worth merging. --Kristjan Wager 17:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment: It was blanked by User:128.171.107.200. I have reverted the "vandalism". --HResearcher 21:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect. I don't see any content here that could be salvaged for inclusion in Hawaiian sovereignty movement, so just flat redirect the page to said article. --Thorne N. Melcher 21:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect - per above --Richard 07:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect In light of the comments I'm seeing, either merge and redirect or simply redirect appears to make sense and I agree with the proposal. --Jpetersen46321 19:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC).
• Merge per everyone above. Pretty large concenus for MREGE & REDIR, and I agree with you all. Daniel.Bryant 06:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. Natgoo 07:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.