Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard-Radcliffe Veritones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harvard-Radcliffe Veritones

Harvard-Radcliffe Veritones (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This article does not cite sources, so nothing here is verifiable except via the Veritones website. Amsuther 15:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - passes WP:MUSIC since they've released five albums. Jayden54 21:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC; their albums are self-published [1]. Wikipedia is not a free webhost for campus clubs Bwithh 21:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - only self-pubished works; no other notariety. SkierRMH,08:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. JDoorjam Talk 00:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - releasing a (self-produced) album doesn't make you notable. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 01:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - this is really more WP:ORG than WP:MUSIC, since it's a college club that performs and records music. Nonetheless, it fails; essentially all Google hits come from their own website, Harvard websites, or college a capella websites. The Harvard Krokodiloes, who have appeared regularly on national television, pass. It's true that there are other college a capella groups no more notable than the Veritones which have pages, e.g. Harvard Din and Tonics, but maybe these should be considered for deletion as well. Strabismic 20:49, 22 December 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.