Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo The Conqurors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 00:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Halo The Conqurors

Not apparently notable (nor even completed, apparently) mod - the mention it has at Halo: Combat Evolved is probably enough. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 23:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• DELETE - Everytime I see a Mod page, it's usually created by the mod creator in an attempt to promote the mod. These kinds of pages do not belong. Targetter 23:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn mod. --Pboyd04 00:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete an unreleased mod has zero chance of being notable and thus warrant an article. DrunkenSmurf 00:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Hm. Perhaps if more information were added, it would be considered worthy of an article? Information as to what is planned to be replaced/added, how it's intended to work, etc...there could also be some information about the 'sister mod' for H:TC, which is for Starwars: Galactic Battlegrounds and will be similar enough that it shouldn't have a different page, but different enough to be worthy of extended mention.

-58

• Delete, even if more information is added. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-04 01:31Z
• Delete. Yes, even if there's more information about the subject -- the issue is not lack of information, it's the lack of significance. Obviously, if it becomes the next Counter-Strike, that's a different story, but half-completed game mods are a dime a dozen. There's not even any guarantee that this project will ever get finished. (Most mod projects, after all, do not.) -- Captain Disdain 02:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Dlt bcaus thr's somthing missing. ~ trialsanderrors 06:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Ahhh, if only people spent as much time learning to spell as they did plugging their pointless Halo Mod. -- GWO

Comment. Please be nice and don't bite the newbies. The article contributor appears to be editing in good faith (even though he's wrong), and a lot of people have trouble with spelling. Captainktainer * Talk 01:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Also... not that it changes anything, but this is not a Halo mod, as it says in the very first sentence of the article. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 03:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.