Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall Petch

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 00:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hall Petch

The article is kind of messy, but it appears to be a summary of the research paper of two people about material slippage. WP:NOR comes to mind. Also, the article claims to be copyrighted, which is kind of odd. Radiant_>|< 10:01, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Most of the article reads like an abstract for a published paper. This is much too specialized to be considered encyclopedic. ManoaChild 10:34, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, they investigated the properties of a substance with a copyright label (shouldn't those be trademarked instead?) Anyway, abstracts to scientific papers don't belong here. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:47, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Original Research - see Google Scholar [1] Dlyons493 13:03, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I still don't know whether the title title refers to the researchers (guess 1), the name of the 'effect' (guess 2) or the name of the research project (guess 3). Alf 14:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• I have tagged it as copyvio. Guess the people who dumped it on WP won't be coming back to rephrase their abstract (dating back to the year 2000), but just in case: Delete, original research. --DrTorstenHenning 11:36, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.