Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habitat theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 00:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Habitat theory

A google search on the term shows no matches related to the assertion made in article, appears to be original research CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per above. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

I checked this before creating the new page and found a number of references such as

http://www.wuplet.com/thesis/chapter3.htm http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/travel/history.htm

which seem to suggest that this info is not totally without foundation. Suggest not deleting. It does need more content though - at least some references.- Unsigned by user:86.134.30.182

• Delete totally obscure term that was coined by Jay Appleton. Dottore So 19:49, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

IMO information should not be deleted simply because it is "obscure". On the other hand, if this really is a one-person coinage not recognised by anyone else then I agree.

• Delete Jwissick^(t)(c) 22:04, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.