Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 19:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gurg

• Delete. I do not believe that the article in question is sufficiently notable to merit inclusion in Wikipedia. — Mike • 04:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unneccessary. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 05:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. These non-notable Harry Potter character/detail articles are really getting out of hand. --Coredesat 10:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Their deletion is too. Mass nominations for deletion when most can be merged is bad too. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Gurg Merge and redirect to a Harry Potter article on giants if it exists and if this info is verifiable. ' Gurg is the title of the leader of a pack of giants. That's about it. Nothing more can be said about the subject. Does not warrant its own article. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, this is the smallest bit of trivia possible. Maybe mention it in one of the Harry Potter articles, but this little mention doesn't need attribution that a merge & redirect preserves, IMO. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per comments above. Tobelia 08:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I would agree with Mgm, but the Harry Potter article on giants does not exist. I'm sure this sentence can find a home elsewhere. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 16:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. AgentPeppermint 17:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.