Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guido Gybels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was copyvio. – ABCD^e✉ 19:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Guido Gybels

Likely vanity article created by anon IP address. Supplied information (other than job title which is unnotable) is vague and unsourced. Only external link is to blog. Already mentioned (by self-edit) on employers entry. Requires serious context, evidence of notability and expansion or Delete. Deiz 00:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The only reference is a personal web page. Vanity--Adam ^(talk) 00:30, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep There are 991 hits for "Guido Gybels" on Google. The article just needs to be cleaned up and expanded a bit. Ruby 01:30, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • The google hits test is only a secondary indicator, highlighting as it does simply the number of times a given term appears in webpages... 991 google hits is on its own absolutely no indicator of notability (check out Notability) and lends no credibility to a 'keep' vote without other evidence. The figure or search criteria also appears to be wrong, a google search for "guido gybels" returned 603 hits, 190 of which are unique.
• Delete. Gamaliel 01:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deleted as a copyvio from http://www.160characters.org/pages.php?action=view&pid=33. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Not a speedy. -- JJay 02:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.