Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grrr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Now let's see if I get slated for this. Uncle G and Dionyseus seems to imply a keep as it exists in wiktionary, but I feel this is not relevant as it is for dicdefs and WP is for articles. Apart from that there is concern about references, and also I note that Yuckfoo is an extreme inclusionist.Blnguyen | rant-line 01:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Grrr
Just a list of (rather long) dictionary definitions and translations. This information would be better off (in somewhat condensed form) in Wiktionary. —Psychonaut 22:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- wikt:grr is currently a stub dictionary article. Uncle G 23:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep As per Uncle G. Also, list is not 'rather long.' Dionyseus 23:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's not the list that's long; it's the definitions that are long. And Uncle G's contribution is not a keep vote; it's just a comment. —Psychonaut 23:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - non-encyclopedic; original research. — ERcheck (talk) 04:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Man, I'd really like to keep this article, although I'm not sure valid references can be found for it. It's just too funny. I only noticed it because I use Trillian which links words to Wikipedia articles. howcheng {chat} 17:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and merge to Wikitionary. Agne27 05:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- keep please it is a notable onomatopoeic word Yuckfoo 05:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-encyclopedic. OSU80 22:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
