Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groin attack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 21:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Groin attack

All the relevant information regarding someone being injured in the genital region belongs on the pages devoted to those portions of anatomy. The page was originally created as a joke to link from Steven Seagal. We don't need this page any more than we need a page called "shin kick" to detail what happens when you kick someone in the shins. Halloween jack 17:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep but add sources and clean up a little. I think the page has grown substantially from being a joke page. The cultural and self defense references add to the encyclopedic value this article could have---however, they do need to be properly sourced and a little better formatted. Agne 18:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Agne summed it up. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · contribs · e@} 18:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. It might make me cringe, but it's pretty well written and referenced, and I can't see what's unencyclopedic about it. RGTraynor 19:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Though it pains me to say it, Keep. Love the biblical quotation! An attack on the groin seems to have specific (and referenced) legal, social, and cultural implications, but for some reason the name doesn't quite sit right with me. If anyone can suggest a better one, I'd recommend a rename keep. Ziggurat 02:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep not a joke page -- believe me, groin attacks are no joke!!! --Ghetteaux 06:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but the picture should probably be removed, it is very difficult to make it out. Yamaguchi先生 08:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep - the topic has social relevance far beyond that of a "shin kick", which, to my knowledge is not Biblically punishable by dismemberment, nor does it feature as a scene à faire in comedy. That this attack is both forbidden and a frequent source of humor is worthy of explication. bd2412 T 12:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.