Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenside, South Africa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to Greenside, Gauteng. JPD (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Greenside, South Africa

Subject too trivial. Xhin 22:58, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and merge with Greenside, Gauteng. It is a town, and it already has a Wikipedia entry. I had no trouble expanding this article after a search on Google with "Greenside, South Africa", during which I also discovered the existing Wikipedia article on this suburb. -- Mareklug ^talk 23:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

• This nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 13:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and merge as per Mareklug StuartF 13:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Seems all the suburbs of Johannesburg are in the process of being listed, a trend with which I have problems. All suburbs of all town? At best, Merge into Johannesburg. Next, I suppose it will be individual streets in cities.Ted 18:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • All suburbs of all town? - why not? Punkmorten 21:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and merge as per Mareklug also. Dlyons493 Talk 21:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and merge as per most above. Real place with real communities of interest and as such worthy of an article. Capitalistroadster 21:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as per above --Danielrocks123 22:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per all above. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 23:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep now this might sound like I'm making a point, and well I am, but most suburbs have elementery schools, even high schools. If they are, by consenus, notable, surely a suburb that serves far more people than a school, would be notable. And there is unlike most school usually no problem in finding several reliable sources on the subject. --Eivind^t@c 00:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • It already has a Wikipedia entry, so merge. Punkmorten 08:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per above. --Coredesat 00:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per above. CalJW 05:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.