Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greendale Construction Limited
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete - no context/content. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Greendale Construction Limited
non-notable company, fails WP:CORP. Originally prodded [1], but prod tag was removed by author who gave the following reasoning: "I object to the deletion because Wikipedia is constantly growing, making room for new articles etc. Look at pointless ones like Bubbles (video game) which has no information. Think about it." I have taken the author's advice and thought about it, but it still doesn't appear notable to me. --AbsolutDan (talk) 00:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete I'm usually inclusionary, but this reads like advertising -- Librarianofages 02:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete, pure spam. Pascal.Tesson 02:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete the possible advertisment. --Starionwolf 03:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- delete. Fails WP:CORP. ~Chris (talk/e@) 04:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, does not assert any notable qualities; nor do any seem to be apparent under WP:CORP. I'd hate to call it spam or even an ad, really - they don't go out of the way to praise the company and it seems to be quite clinical and factual. They also fail his own yardstick, the "bubbles (video game) test" for measuring content: bubbles has 559 words, Greendale Ltd has 63. Kuru talk 04:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, still reads like an advertisement for non-notable company, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk 04:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
