Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green UML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:46, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Green UML

When exactly was it decided that each and every thing software-related was encyclopedic? What this looks like to me is a vanity article on a vanity project. "Green UML" -wikipedia got me 53 unique googles (and I don't think they all were about this), which is microscopic for anything computer related. I don't see the encyclopedic merit of this article. -R. fiend 21:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable software. Total downloads ever: 796. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-27 21:54Z
• Delete per above. Ruby 00:30, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Latinus 00:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable software. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 08:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.