Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grandasia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Grandasia

Contested prod. Adspam for non-notable local business. Opabinia regalis 03:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete as local business spam without sources. Oh yeah, I don't think being associated with Asian Boston is necessarily a good thing. ColourBurst 04:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• "non-notable local business"? So a notable business is okay to be listed? How does a "non-notable local business" get notable? Are you saying the little guys are not worth your bandwidth? Or that "Chinese" business isn't worth your bandwidth? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grandasia (talk • contribs).
  • This is an encyclopedia. It has policies and consensus-based guidelines that other editors use to determine whether a subject is worthy of inclusion. Instead of making further generalizations about some potential racist motivation for bringing the article you created to a deletion discussion, please familiarize yourself with WP:CORP, WP:RS, and WP:V. WP:VANITY and WP:SPAM may apply, based on your user name being that of the subject of the article. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• So how does a one-man show like Asian Boston qualify to be listed here any way? By stirring up controversy? Can't we do the same starting with this article's screenshots? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grandasia (talk • contribs).
  • Asian Boston received wide press attention from The Boston Globe (a reputable newspaper) meaning it has independant sources to back up the facts in the article.- Mgm|^(talk) 12:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence that this business meets WP:CORP. No reliable sources indicating any mentions other than business directory listings. No prejudice to change recommendation if proper citations are added. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and also because it's vanity (check name of article creator). Danny Lilithborne 06:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CORP, WP:V, RS, etc. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 07:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spam, vanity, advertising, non-notable, you name it. -- Merope 14:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.