Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graffe's Wizard Compilation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. You'll note every "keep" vote is from an anonymous IP address, with very few (or none) contributions outside this article and its AfD. At least this time they bothered to learn the correct term for "keep". — JIP | Talk 07:28, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Graffe's Wizard Compilation

per author: nothing much to say about it; also NN vanity. Groeck 17:37, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

• Wow, not much there. I halfway think it could be speedied, but I'll just say delete instead. Friday (talk) 18:03, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Isotope23 18:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• "Keep." This is a work in progress, not everyone is a Wikipedia ninja - things evolve.
• Delete I guesss there isn't much to say. DES ^(talk) 18:15, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per article. --TM ^(talk) 19:14, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• "Keep." Tens of thousands of users use Graffe.com - and it is a respected community.
• Delete. Borders on speedy. If the contributor says "there really is not much to say about it" then why did he say it? Isn't there an old saw about having nothing to say but saying it anyway? ♠ DanMS 00:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No attempt has been made to assert notability. TheMadBaron 02:32, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notability has been established see graffe.com
• "Keep." This is a work in progress, and the website in question is quite influential with regard to EverQuest and World of Warcraft. --J. Abd al-Hajjaj
• Keep - it needs to be fleshed out more and it will be. Graffe.com has a page ranking with Goolgle.com of 5/10 which is quite high. Most sites on the web are 1-2 range. 5+ is considered to be an authority on a specific subject matter or collection of interests/topics. Cam
• *Keep* - After over a year of posting there I still see new people (with over 1000 posts). It has a large active community and well deserves an entry. klietus
• *Keep* - No reason to destroy it when it's just getting on its feet. We're making progress. -Ayralin
• Keep ··gracefool |☺ 07:38, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn forum. --TimPope 18:03, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Casting Delete spell. Rolls 2D6.. Critical Success! :) --Sean Jelly Baby? 18:15, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity and nn. Sock-puppeting and erasing votes doesn't help their cause either. -- Rune Welsh ταλκ 22:39, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.