Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Higginson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gordon Higginson

Gordon_Higginson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

There is no assertion of notability except from its own sources. There are just about no external reviews of this subject, and a search reveals very little about this subject. On concern here is Wikipedia:Attribution and Wikipedia:Notability. This subject seems very obscure (not very well known) to be posted in an encyclopedia. --Snooziums 20:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

NOTE: Snooziums may be listing these as a response to another AFD, rather than on their particular merit or lack thereof. Snooziums, have you read WP:POINT?

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 17:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, per my nomination. --Snooziums 20:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:A, lacking sources Alf^Photoman 15:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: The article references primary sources but that's about it. Researching the topic, I did find results about him, but nothing reliable. Legitimate sources for a Gordon Higginson seem to be about an honored engineer, not a spiritualist. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 17:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This one does show no possible evidence of notability and no likely sources.DGG 00:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.