Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goo (cartoon character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 16:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Goo (cartoon character)

Delete: Made by a new user, they've received the welcome, but this is still here. I really don't have a clue here... Really vague, and indescript. Highway 21:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. A Google search for "Matt Wills" and "Goo" returns no relevant hits. The cartoon is unverifiable and must be non-notable. --TantalumTelluride 21:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article was created in order to promote the cartoon. This is obvious by the fact that it was posted by an anonymous user (only important to show no background)and if you look at the summary of the uploaded picture, it says "Author: Matt Wills url: none, i created it. I CREATED THIS PICTURE!". Wikipedia is NOT a billboard.C3H5N3O92010 00:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Obviously. Nigelthefish 17:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep it Obviously, NOT. Look at this, "...although the website is still underconstruction." Of course google didn't turn anything up!!! On the other notion, you said above, "The article was created in order to promote the cartoon. This is obvious by the fact that it was posted by an anonymous user (only important to show no background)and if you look at the summary of the uploaded picture, it says 'Author: Matt Wills url: none, i created it. I CREATED THIS PICTURE!'. Wikipedia is NOT a billboard." My response to you: All of that rubbish you posted is untrue and insulting. The user was not anonymous, because it was me! The article was NOT posted to promote the cartoon. Oh and by the way, I DREW THAT PICTURE, SO NO WONDER IT WAS CREATED BY MATT WILLS, ME, THE AUTHOR OF THE CARTOON! I am DISGUSTED! wilmat09 17:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep it Obviously, I'm guessing from your lack of responses, that you are stumped. Here's something else that I think I'll just throw in your face...Notice that I made another paragraph that was titled "see also". If I was really trying to promote this cartoon, explain to me why I would include links in the artical about OTHER cartoons. Hmmm???wilmat09
• Delete The author admits this was his own creation and if this was a notable cartoon Google or Yahoo would turn up SOME trace of it or where it was published. This does not meet the guidelines for importance even if the author feels it does. If the website is under construction and this was a NOTABLE cartoon, it would have turned up a trace of it regardless of website status as Google and Yahoo bots find pages over a period of time, not right away. This is self promotion and is not the place for this. Showtime203 03:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.