Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Cedar Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 01:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Glen Cedar Park

This article contains little or no content, simply stating 'Glen Cedar Park is a park in Toronto', and giving its address. The park is utterly non-notable. I have speedily deleted this park under CSD A4 in the past, but as it has been recreated, I think AFD is necessary, as the creator disagrees with my view. Non notable park, no content other than a rephrasing of the title, an address, and a pretty picture. Delete. Proto::type 11:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Note: The articles creator has been indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia.--Porqin 12:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to Forest Hill, Toronto. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-26 11:52Z
• Delete I don't see any reason why this small park, with no significance, belongs in an encyclopedia. --Porqin 12:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing to merge. Vizjim 14:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, with the photo possibly being added to the Forest Hill page. SliceNYC 14:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- if this is all we can say about it, we might as well delete this. Mangojuice^talk 15:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I would say speedy it as recreated content, but it appears Proto wants some consensus. So delete it is. --Kuzaar^-T-C- 17:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable park, not really anything to merge. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 17:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.