Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene fixation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect ~ trialsanderrors 06:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gene fixation

Gene fixation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

ANY mutation, not just genes, can become fixed JVC 10:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - can you suggest a non-genetic mutation for our consideration? If the article's mistitled, what alternative would you suggest? No opinion for now. -- Bpmullins | Talk 15:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Mutations in intergenic regions such as introns can also become fixed. Opabinia regalis 02:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• This discussion has been added as a test case to the proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (science). –trialsanderrors 00:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment this would've been cleaner as a page move, but since JVC has created the more appropriately titled fixation (population genetics) and populated it with content, I'm going to go ahead and redirect this to that page. (Full disclosure: I created this page, following a redlink, and gave no thought to the title, so blame me for the inaccuracy.) Opabinia regalis 02:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• The redirect does the job. Nothing further to see here, I think. -- Bpmullins | Talk 03:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.