Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gapping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 02:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gapping

Neologism from the future? Crystal bollocks? Eivind^t@c 11:14, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete This has got to be a joke. Nothing else links to it. Dolive21 11:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Pure nonsense. Davelong 12:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Crystal bollocks sounds quite a delicate condition!  (aeropagitica)  13:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as patent nonsense. Feezo (Talk) 13:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Patent nonsense, as is the other article created by Scorpio 518 (talk • contribs), Round buildings. Fan1967 17:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above. He can't even spell "vestigial ". Gwernol 18:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

• Vestigial's not that common a word. I'm more bothered that he can't spell "rabbit". Fan1967 18:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Obvious silliness. Evillan 21:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete G1 patent nonsense. Deizio 01:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: Hoax. (Although I think there is a real term 'gapping' with respect to spark plug adjustment.) Peter Grey 06:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to spark plug per Peter Gray. Haikupoet 03:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.