Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Show Closing Lines
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. See WP:NOT. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 12:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Game Show Closing Lines
Doesn't fit into wikipedia. Unencyclopedic useless, and unhelpful information. M8v2 22:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete- It isn't really important.--SUIT42 20:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Unencyclopedic ultratrivia listcruft Bwithh 22:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Priceless! Fg2 01:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete I found the content interesting, but it's ultimately just trivia. Danny Lilithborne 21:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Move to Wikiquote. CrossEyed7 15:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep or merge into the various articles on the shows and/or hosts. While this is far from the most vital article on WP, many of these became catchprases in their own right. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Merge contents into articles mentioned. Is not written as an encyclopedic article, is not notable of one. No actual articles link to it. CattleGirl talk | e@ 10:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep If someone is looking for "what show had that closing line?", it could be useful. A person certainly would save a lot of time and effort that would otherwise go to looking through individual game show articles one by one. KrakatoaKatie 03:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.