Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOOD Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GOOD Magazine

The issue at hand is whether or not a magazine that has published exactly one issue meets notability standards. It's a nice-looking publication, definitely not a scrubby little zine, but is that sufficient? I'm undecided myself, but I'm putting this here to see what the consensus is. --Pagana 16:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Pagana 16:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. If it was only launched this month, then it probably isn't notable yet. Few magazines publications are capable of being notable before publishing a dozen issues. zephyr2k 17:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. If the publication has wide enough distribution, the is going to be a demand for encyclopedic information about the publication. (Disclosure: I wrote the article.) --Ldrhcp 17:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Newer magazine doesn't belong here. It's not hard to wait until it's been out for a while longer (to see if it lasts for one thing, and for another...to see if it's even worth being here). RobJ1981 17:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Until the publication has a track record to determine distribution and notability. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -- Fan-1967 19:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn, until such time as it becomes n, if ever. --Aaron 20:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.