Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future World Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Future World Music

Future World Music (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject of article does not meet guidelines for notability per WP:CORP. Nv8200p talk 02:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 18:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not assert notability, possible spam. --Daniel J. Leivick 02:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete "according to their official website"? Needs better sourcing than that to survive. Non-notable, spam, and probably vanity as well. --Pigman^talk 05:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think it passes company notability guideline so I'm also going to say delete. I also think there is a conflict of interest due to the wording. James086^Talk 09:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and James ^{Khukri -} 09:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:Music, WP:V, WP:Spam. Cricket02 19:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.