Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freehold Circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 05:40, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Freehold Circle

Here is another nn traffic circle. Roadcruft. Delete --JAranda | yeah 02:40, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -Nameneko 05:47, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete it's time to go for this article alf 10:53, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Roadcruft. --Carnildo 22:52, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep; what the fuck kind of reason is "Here is another nn traffic circle. Roadcruft."? --SPUI (talk) 04:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • How about "waste of electrons"? Is that sufficient? --Calton | Talk 02:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Being from New Jersey I would argue that traffic circles are easily as notable as state highways. Moreso for infamous ones like the Somerville Circle. Al 13:53, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • A traffic circle that went away 25 years ago is notable? This is insane! Pilatus 18:38, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Okay, I'll give you that. I guess it's been 25 years since I was in Freehold. I've changed my vote. Delete. Al 19:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
      • The intersection is still known by locals as Freehold Circle. It is still there, just not in the form of a circle. --SPUI (talk) 01:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ouch. An entry for a traffic circle that no longer exists. Pilatus 18:34, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Article does not establish or even assert notability. --Stormie 02:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• A decades-gone TRAFFIC CIRCLE? Delete before it metastasizes. --Calton | Talk 02:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, important part of the history of transport in Freehold Borough, New Jersey. Kappa 03:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence given that it's important at all, actually. CDC (talk) 04:35, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree with the nominator. Zach (Sound Off) 05:22, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - our mission is to compile knowledge, not just any facts. --Pjacobi 09:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Freehold Township, New Jersey or Freehold Borough, New Jersey - important and useful information, why get rid of perfectly good information? Alphax ^τεχ 09:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, there has to be a limit somewhere. Lou I 10:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Traffic circles are usually not notable, existent or non existent. My bus goes through three traffic circles in less than a kilometre and none of those look significant or are significant. Alright, maybe this was a somewhat larger traffic circle, but it is still less notable than a school. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• EXTREME FREEHOLD DELETE. We've had more than enough of this. -R. fiend 19:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme prejudice. Nothing notable about this at all. User:Zoe|^(talk) 00:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn --redstucco 09:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence that this thing had any impact on the world. Friday (talk) 04:31, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep passes the impacts thousands of people test. Klonimus 04:34, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.