Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedomtarian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Freedomtarian

As the article itself explains, this is a non-notable neologism. A quick Google check does not suggest it has any significant real-world use [1]. Mattley ^(Chattley) 10:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - few google hits, non notable. --Oscarthecat 10:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. per nom. Crunch 13:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - This neologism is less than twelve hours old. I'm not even kidding; it first aired last night at 23:50. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 15:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Wait, you guys are hypocrites. Check this out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness

Not to mention Mattley you bully/stalker, that google hit point is retarded. You tried to use it on the communist page and it backfired on your ass as my section title had more google hits than some of the other section titles in the article and you still demanded its deletion.

You just want to delete anything I poist. Period. (Gibby 17:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC))

besides this was aired on national television on a fake news channel and repeated by one respected real jounralist and one fake journalist...not to mention said fake journalist has created new words before and some have recieved their own pages... It is also too early to tell if it is not notable, and seriously, who desides what is notable and what is not? (Gibby 17:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC))

• Delete. "Freedomtarian" was a one-off word Colbert used in the interview.. "Truthiness" won a word of the year award and had an AP article written about it. They're not comparable, yet. If "freedomtarian" catches on then we'll write an article about it. Rhobite 17:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. It's not "too early to tell if it is not notable" — it's too early to tell if it is notable. --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 17:57, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and welcome to Wikipedia. Gazpacho 18:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 22:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with The Colbert Report -- Astrokey44|talk 00:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with The Colbert Report, who knows this could be the word of the year for 2006!
• Delete as non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Merge would be OK. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-13 06:10Z
• Delete. Neologism, non-notable, used only once, has no meaning other than being a synonym for "libertarian". A redirect to libertarianism would be acceptable. -- Nikodemos (f.k.a. Mihnea) 11:40, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.