Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For The Children (politics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Majorly (Talk) 13:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] For The Children (politics)

For The Children (politics) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Soapbox, poorly referenced article, original research, etc. Dragomiloff 18:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Our children need to be protected from articles such as this one. For their sake, this entry should be deleted. Rearden Metal 19:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC) (For those with broken sarcasm detectors, I vote to Keep it.)
• Weak Keep - I've seen the phrase being used quote often around the internet, so I think it's quite a notable phrase, and it gets quite a lot of hits on Google News, which means I'm going with a "weak keep" for now, but it definitely needs some references. Jayden54 21:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Not only the Simpsons, but several other programmes (South Park comes to mind) mock the insincere use of this phrase, usually by politicans. SkierRMH,08:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Probably needs cleanup. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.