Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Follow me!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus. Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 15:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Follow me!

Follow me! (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I can find no reference to this program. Grant it the name is somewhat open ended if you will. I found a reference to an ESL program called "Speak To Me" that may be related. James084 19:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I remember watching the program in TV in Argentina; I'll look for more info to add. -- dockingman^talk 07:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: there is a reference to the show at Follow Me (disambiguation), dated before than the creation of the Follow me! article, and by a different editor. -- dockingman^talk 07:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment 2: There is at least a reference from BBC having such a show and its success in China; [1]. I can't seem to find what would be the notability criteria for TV shows... any ideas? -- dockingman^talk 07:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 02:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, article does not assert the notability of subject. The one reference is a trivial mention in passing by one of the involved parties. -- Chondrite 20:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

"Keep" Follow me was a popular english course from the BBC that you would buy in a set of Video Cassettes in Colombia where it was well known. I was trying to find references in internet about this program because I just remember one of its funny musical didactical scenes

• Keep - I found several references to the show, including this article (middle of page 2) which asserts that 100 million Chinese people watched.--Kubigula (talk) 17:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • That's another passing reference, it does comment that the program was widely viewed in China but does not cover the subject in depth sufficient to support an article. Chondrite 06:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    • True. I guess my point is that if 100 million Chinese watched the show, then it must be notable. So, I think it is worth keeping as a stub and giving people a chance to flesh it out and find information and sources.--Kubigula (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
      • The problem is that it is not possible to write a proper encyclopedia article on any subject tha conforms to Wikipedia content policies without relying on in-depth coverage by multiple, independent, reliable sources. -- Chondrite 18:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Proper TV programme; but more sources needed otherwise it will, eventually be Deleted. 86.20.53.195 17:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia does not need to provide an article covering every television program that has ever been produced. WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE -- Chondrite 18:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with BBC - series presented by national television networks are sufficiently notable, but there's not quite enough here to stand alone. B.Wind 03:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.