Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flocabulary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Flocabulary
- – (View log)
This appears to be simply an advertisment with slight WP:A or WP:N a work in progress. Christopher Jost 01:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep in mind that I've not yet completed writing the article and, as such, more citations and a few more sections are coming. However, if the article appears to be an advertisement, then I welcome anyone to trim out any POV. I'm not sure where you're seeing WP:A problems. Your claims of a WP:N violation are understandable, but I think that notability is established by the amount of publicity the project has recieved. Thanks, --Brandt Luke Zorn 03:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Seems an encyclopedic topic (just about) - Keep and tag for improvement. Vizjim 09:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, encyclopedic topic. --DorisHノート 17:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Well written, enough coverage to show notability, and better referenced than the vast majority of existing content. -- Mikeblas 18:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly notable per the sources linked (as well as the coverage referenced on the site's press page). Could use a little copy-editing in spots, but I don't see this as "simply an advertisement". JavaTenor 21:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Well attributed, but spammy - clean it up. --Dennisthe2 23:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Would this article be appropriate for inclusion into the Hip-hop and/or Eduction WikiProjects? I think it could be improved with help from others, though I am not a member of either of those two WikiProjects and so won't slap the WikiProject templates on the talk page without advise. --Brandt Luke Zorn 01:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's still a bit spammy, but attribs are enough. Realkyhick 03:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Notability proven with citations. - Freechild 07:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
