Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firecold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Firecold

advertising spam, proded but prod removed by author Akradecki 22:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity. Alexa ranking is 1,694,776 [1]--Nishkid64 23:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Blatant advertisement SubSeven 00:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Not spam at all. Should stay. I put it up so people could see about Firecold. I did not tell them to come over to Firecold itself. This is not spam. So what is it has a high rating. It is still good! Medos 10:22, 01 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - please don't take offense, Medos, this discussion isn't about whether your site is good or not. It's about whether Wikipedia is the appropriate place for what you've written. We are first and last, an encyclopedia, which means we're not a forum, discussion group or place to promote your favorite website or web forum. Subjects have to meet a high standard of notability to be included in an encyclopedia. Akradecki 12:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete asap. Totally unwikipedian. --Húsönd 03:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ryūlóng 03:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advertising, with some childish commentary/vandalism. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 16:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.