Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Apanui

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete for now. If Mai Time is ever created than of course she can be included there.--Wizardman 01:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fiona Apanui

Fiona Apanui (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article is little more than a short self-description of someone who is a TV show host (perhaps) in New Zealand and a red link to the name of that show. This is too little informational context for even a stub article entry. If "Mai Time" had an article (it doesn't), then this sort of information would belong there instead. Bumm13 01:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

• Merge with Mai Time if created. Hotmann 05:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I've updated with some sources. Ziggurat 01:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with Mai Time (after creating it) — the show itself seems to be more notable (judging from the titles of the articles added as sources). IMDb verifies the show's existence,*. and that of "Fiona Apanui" as a "presenter" in "unknown seasons." Other than that, no notability information on Fiona Apanui seems to be available. I would say delete, with no prejudice as to creation of a sourced article about Mai Time, or merge with Mai Time if created prior to deletion. Carolfrog 01:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete-Person not-notable. The show doesn't seem notable either. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 02:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep but expand. Notable does not mean widely known. A program in Maori cannot be very popular outside New Zealand Alf photoman 18:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete According to the article Mai Time is cult TV. If that was true, we shouldn't be having this discussion. I can't say merge with an article that doesn't exist. Kripto 20:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  19:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.