Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingershield safety (USA) Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fingershield safety (USA) Inc.

Blatant spam for non-notable company, no assertion opf meeting WP:CORP, their site has been reverted several times from safety-related articles, and the user Nikpatel (talk • contribs), whose creation this is, has no history elsewhere - and took up immediately after I left a spam warning for Davidwikipedia (talk • contribs), whose edits are also (no doubt quite by coincidence) entirely related to spamming this product all over the project. Just zis Guy you know? 10:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. — getcrunk what?! 12:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:SPAM. Pascal.Tesson 13:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is not free ad space. --DarkAudit 14:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - "Did you know that every year the fingers of 40 children are crushed by deadly spam?" --IslaySolomon 15:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:SPAM and WP:CORP DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{WHAT I MESSED UP} 16:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I'm off to form WikiSpamShield Safety (although it would be (Aus) (Pty Ltd) in my case). SM247^{My Talk} 23:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Spam. Even backreferencing to Door safety and Door guard to promote the product. Kevin_b_er 01:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as SPAM. I remember these guys when I lived in Oxfordshire; I remember being impressed by the product, I remember being annoyed by the price, I remember being horrified by the Cost-benefit analysis performed by one ugly childless accountant... --die Baumfabrik 06:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.