Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filolidia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Filolidia

Delete as a neologism. One Google result, which is completely irrelevant (it's part of an email address). Even the breakdown of the name makes no sense, why would someone use Greek and English in a word? The prod tag was removed by the creator without comment. Rory096 17:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Mangojuice 17:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable neologism, though Greek and English is not necessarily a valid reason for deletion. Royboycrashfan 20:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Oh, please. Avi 20:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• People need it Sorry, if we made any insertion or correction in a wrong way having no real ideas how it had to be done. Anyway, this term really exists and already included in several printed dictionaries in Russia. It's very common already among plastic caps collectors all over the world. This type of collecting is brain new (several years only), but already have clubs in Russia, Japan, Chili and other countries. These are arguments. Anyway, its up to you to take a final decision. It would be pitty to leave people without the name of their hobby (try on eBay or other places the search for "caps" and you will see how many colectors of plastic caps are in the world). Thank you for your patience to read my pearl to the end.
• Delete with 1 google hit, I doubt it is even in Russia. Regardless however, it's not a known english word. Elfguy 13:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• No Vote. Could this be in any way related to pog collecting? -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 09:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, it can be re-created at a later date if there are signs of actual usage.Bjones 13:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete can't see anything encyclopeic here FloNight 13:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.