Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenmore Baldwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lauren Fenmore Baldwin. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fenmore Baldwin

Fenmore_Baldwin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

STRONG DELETE This character is an infant who was born last October - nowhere near notable. A mention in the Michael and Lauren Baldwin articles would suffice. Kogsquinge 03:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to The Young and the Restless or List of The Young and the Restless characters. The argument that an infant can't be notable only really applies to actual infants; fictional characters are a bit different. Zetawoof^(ζ) 23:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • As a side point, even a non-fictional infant may be notable. See, for example, Princess Lalla Khadija of Morocco and Prince Hisahito of Akishino. Crypticfirefly 04:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Lauren Fenmore Baldwin. The full name of the infant character is Fenmore Michael Baldwin, which should redirect to List of The Young and the Restless characters. Rather than merging this article into the list, I think its easier to create the 2 redirects and then separately add an entry for the infant to the list if/when information is available (e.g., who plays the character?). -- Black Falcon 16:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to Lauren Fenmore Baldwin. He doesn't qualify as a character yet; and he's already mentioned on both "parents" articles, so there's no need to merge; and I don't see a good rationale for redirecting to one parent over the other. Redirecting to the main Young and the Restless article would be my second choice, but I really think deletion is most appropriate here.--Kubigula (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I suggested redirecting to the mother as "Fenmore Baldwin" is her last name, whereas the full name of the child is "Fenmore Michael Baldwin". But, a redirect to the "list of characters" article would be OK as well (in fact, so would a delete, but I feel it's a plausible search term). -- Black Falcon 20:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Good point. Based on that, I suppose it's a possible search term for either the mother or the child, and a redirect to the mother's article, which mentions both, is appropriate. Changing my position accordingly.--21:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Kubigula (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.