Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fema Camps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-26 09:47Z

[edit] Fema Camps

Fema Camps (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Concern was OR. Article is wholly unsourced. Procedural nom, abstain. - NYC JD make a motion 19:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I have heard of this conspiracy theory before, but this article treats some complete conjecture as if it were fact and without any sources. Whether the theory is worthy of an article I couldn't say. --Daniel J. Leivick 19:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Every single Ghit I can find is a blog, a forum or a conspiracy website. If it was better written it could possibly be merged into one of the conspiracy theory articles but it needs cleaning up and ... hang on, how do you source conspiracy theory articles? :) EliminatorJR 19:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Was this even contested as such? The OP simply removed the tag. That's more like vandalism. Potatoswatter 23:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • PROD tags may be removed by anyone without an explanation. - NYC JD (make a motion) 00:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Google leads to nothing but conspiracy websites and wannabe blogs. While I consider the American government to be evil, I don't think they're =this= evil. Denni^talk 02:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.