Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fellowship Church
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus ~ trialsanderrors 11:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fellowship Church
non-notable and non-verifiable per WP:CHURCH Adam Riley Talk 19:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable church. Dragomiloff 21:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable per WP:CHURCH and no sources to show notability (which means it also fails WP:V. Jayden54 21:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - I think they're big enough and influential enough to be notable. More sources will help and should be easy to find. -- Bpmullins | Talk 22:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - don't see any sources that would show notability. SkierRMH,09:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep They are the primary subject of multiple published pieces by multiple independent publishers. This profile comes from chruchbusiness.com, which is owned by a company also publishing magazines like Food Product Design and Infection Control Today, so is independent by even the most ridiculous standards I've seen at AfD. The article already has the piece from Vision Magazine - reviewing their articles, they seem to specialize in covering megachurches. Supposedly the fourth moth influential Christian church in the USA during 2006 according to thechurchreport.com [1]. GRBerry 04:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep nomination appears to be part of a WP:Point —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pastordavid (talk • contribs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
