Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat Darrell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Grease Trucks. The non-commercial content (e.g. ingredients) are already listed in the target article and mentions in media suggest sufficient notability to support a redirect. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fat Darrell
Is this a notable sandwich? Subwayguy 01:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per CSD A7. Sr13 01:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, only appears to refer to one sandwich at one university cafe. Not very notable, per nomination. Bob talk 01:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to the Grease Trucks articleDelete and redirect per nom and Cattlegirl--M8v2 02:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)- Delete and no merge, as it already has a mention in Grease Trucks. This is also a bit of an advertisement- 'only $5 each'. CattleGirl talk | e@ 02:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 03:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable - and reads to me as more than just a "bit" advertisement - as Cattle Girl points out, "only $5"? a great deal - what, no phone number for delivery? --Krich (talk) 03:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Five dollars? What a bargain! Danny Lilithborne 04:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak redirect to Grease Trucks, assuming the Maxim statement about it being the #1 sandwich in the nation can be sourced. Barring that, delete, as WP:NOT a collection of indiscriminate ingredients. No WP:RS indicating this sandwich is notable beyond, well, being eaten off a Grease Truck. Mmmm, sandwichcruft. --Kinu t/c 04:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect, there is no need to merge any information, the secret ingredients are already listed on that page. The marinara sauce always gives me indigestion, but I still eat them. The sandwich is notable but the whole story is already told in the other article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 05:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and send Grease Trucks to AfD, which is the actual Rutgerscrufty article. Note that the sources at Grease Trucks are actually about the sandwich. ~ trialsanderrors 05:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete per above. Just H 05:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Grease Trucks. Google results indicate it's notable enough to warrant a redirect (USA Today and FOX News reported on its #1 sandwich status), but it doesn't need its own article. -SpuriousQ 06:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all delete comments. --teh tennisman 16:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have no problem deleting this form of the article because it is pathetic. I've had nothing to do with this incarnation. But I do announce that I intend within a week or two to write a decent article about the sandwich which Maxim magazine states is the best in the country (See Grease Trucks article for articles to that effect) .—ExplorerCDT 16:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable per above. - SpLoT (*C*+u+g) 16:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- weak keep or merge into a sandwich list if there is any --Slogankid 16:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect it's already mentioned in grease trucks - 'nuf said there. SkierRMH,19:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)\
- Delete and I'm not sure it could ever have its own article, even if Maxim bestows a title on it. It isn't The Whopper and never will be.--Dmz5 05:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nothing indicates its notability. Mukadderat 18:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This seems to be nonnotable and very little information provided. Davidpdx 07:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.