Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastcraft
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge to P&O. --Tony Sidaway 13:57, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fastcraft
Prod removed, so bringing to AfD. This was a name used by P&O for a ferry service and, as such, not-notable. Eusebeus 09:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge with P&O. Deprodder Kappa ought to have left the prod tag on and added the information to the mother article. Kuzaar 11:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with P&O. GWO
- Merge then redirect. -- Hirudo 13:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect. RGTraynor 16:44, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge then redirect. San Saba 04:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 14:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm not going to post this on every Afd where you put this message, but I think you're wrong about this. I do not think any of the articles he nominated after deprod would qualify as a speedy keep; in fact it looks like consensus is that nearly all of them deserve an Afd. -- Hirudo 14:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps Monicasdude is voting keep on every AfD Eusebus nominates because all of Eusebus' nominations lately have been to articles deprodded by Kappa. Neither behavior is in any way productive. Thatcher131 15:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Point of Information. This sounds like wikistalking; what do you think Thatcher131? As I see it, the conduct of both the deletionists and inclusionists are rather counterproductive. --Folajimi 13:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm not going to post this on every Afd where you put this message, but I think you're wrong about this. I do not think any of the articles he nominated after deprod would qualify as a speedy keep; in fact it looks like consensus is that nearly all of them deserve an Afd. -- Hirudo 14:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
