Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farrokh B. Malihi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete (5d, 1k).--Scimitar ^parley 20:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Farrokh B. Malihi

Vanity. Ifnord 23:23, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment Hmm, 5 patents and 30 papers. If it can be verified then perhaps notable, and a keeper. Otherwise, nn-bio. --Kgf0 23:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC) EDIT: Verified US Patent #4,921,629, which is cited by 36 later patents. IANA Patent Lawyer, so I can't speak to whether that's notable or not. However, if the article is kept, it is in serious need of cleanup, and right now it is somewhere between a blurb and a Curriculum Vitae, neither of which belong here. --Kgf0 19:05, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I can only find two papers on google scholar [1]. Even with patents, he doesn't seem to involved with academia. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 05:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• A list of my patents and published articles can be furnished upon request. Thanks for your interest. Farrokh B. Malihi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.241.23.2 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 October 2005 (UTC).
• Relisted. No vote. Alphax ^τεχ 07:22, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It seems that the article has been written by the subject contrary to best pactice according to WP:VANITY. Further, it fails to meet our notability guidelines according to WP:BIO and needs sources. However, if Farrokh wants to create a user page, he is welcome to post his data on that. Capitalistroadster 07:20, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Delete Malihi is already listed at Modern Iranian scientists and engineers, that mention seems sufficient. (btw: patents at [2], published papers at [3]) --anetode¹ ² ³ 09:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: it would appear that his name was entered on that list by 80.191.11.17 (talk • contribs), the creator of Farrokh B. Malihi, so this is none too reliable. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 09:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
    • Nevertheless, with those links we now know what the precise claims being made are. They can be now be verified or disproven. — Haeleth Talk
• Weak keep if the claims of the article can be verified; they're notable enough. Delete as unverifiable if they can't. The article having apparently been written by the subject is irrelevant: it may not be a good thing, and it means the claims should be checked more thoroughly than otherwise, but it's not grounds for deletion! — Haeleth Talk 13:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The two papers on google scholar seem not to have been cited by anyone. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 14:27, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Outright vanity. Delete under A7 Prashanthns 16:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.